The College of Ghana (UG) has urged the Supreme Courtroom to dismiss a lawsuit introduced by college students looking for to cease the college’s residential reallocation plan.
This was after the courtroom granted a 10-day interim injunction barring the varsity from following the coverage of constructing Commonwealth Corridor and Mensah Sarbah Corridor a residence just for new college students.
Eight college students on the college’s Commonwealth Corridor have been granted a short lived injunction towards the varsity’s housing coverage on 6 January 26 October 2022.
All persevering with college students in Commonwealth and Mensah Sarbah Halls have been barred from being residents of male-only halls by a administration determination.
However the complainants have argued that this determination is a ploy by administration to interrupt the chest of scholar activism and break their affiliation with conventional halls.
In a swimsuit difficult the injunction, the varsity’s administration mentioned the plaintiffs’ motion is “incompetent, frivolous and, in any occasion, untimely” as a result of the plaintiffs haven’t exhausted the inner mechanism of the college’s statutes.
Due to this fact, UG is looking for an order from the courtroom to remain the injunction and forestall the plaintiffs from getting into the college’s Commonwealth Corridor or picketing.
The college argued that the request for an injunction was “useless on arrival as a result of the plaintiff complied with and carried out the defendant council’s housing coverage on December 28, 2022, previous to the submitting of the petition.”
The administration additionally accused the candidates of intentionally misrepresenting data to mislead the courtroom to grant the applying for an injunction.
It mentioned two of the complainants weren’t residents of Commonwealth Corridor and subsequently had no foundation to accuse the college of violating their rights.
“For instance, within the petition, in addition to in all the opposite proceedings on this matter up to now, all of the plaintiffs declare that they’re residents of Commonwealth Corridor. A easy search of the defendant’s paperwork reveals that 3st and 6th The plaintiffs, Adu Kennedy and Solomon Appiah respectively, weren’t residents of Commonwealth Corridor.
“Even worse, 3st the plaintiff is a distance studying scholar who shouldn’t be even entitled to residency on the defendant college underneath the defendant’s residency coverage and will have resided within the Commonwealth solely by way of unlawful and/or unsanctioned means,” the assertion learn in elements.
DISCLAIMER: The views, feedback, opinions, contributions and statements of readers and contributors on this platform don’t essentially mirror the views or insurance policies of Multimedia Group Restricted.