First though Harry Potter 20 years since the movie came out, fantasy movies are still the most watched movies. Fans around the world have grown up watching the series, which has become a contender in the fantasy genre. However, this does not mean that they are innocent.
While Harry Potter Depicts many beloved characters, fans are aware that many of these depictions are not book-accurate. Sometimes, it’s not a big deal, like a subtle change in Snape’s behavior. Others outright enrage fans, such as Ron Weasley being turned into comic relief.
10/10 James Potter is barely featured in the movies
As the late father of the series’ protagonist, James Potter’s presence pervades most of the story. Harry goes from knowing nothing about his parents to slowly gaining information about them, from deep admiration to frustration to understanding.
However, the Harry Potter The films fail to translate Harry’s complicated relationship with his dead father. The films don’t delve too much into the history of the Marauders, and they don’t feature many of James’ flashbacks throughout the series. On top of that, his portrayal in the movies makes him look much older than he actually is – James was 21 when he died.
9/10 The Harry Potter movies do not delve into Lupine’s story
There is no doubt that David Thewlis’ portrayal of Remus Lupine is one of the best performances. Harry Potter. The actor wonderfully brings the energy of this character to the screen, esp Prisoner of Azkaban. However, lack of screen time and poor writing meant that Remus was not well adapted.
Unfortunately, Remus is one of the most unfortunate characters Harry Potter, and the films do not include Remus and Tonk’s difficult love story or fully explore Remus’ struggle with his werewolf condition. It’s understandable that movies don’t have time to include every detail Harry Potter books, but it was still disappointing that the films neglected this character so much.
8/10 Percy Weasley’s betrayal is a big deal in the books
While Percy’s portrayal was flawless in the first two films, accurately portraying Percy’s aggressive attitude and dutiful behavior, the later films failed to contain his complexity. In the books, Percy offers his loyalty to the Ministry of Magic, which creates an almost unbridgeable chasm between him and his family.
Percy’s isolation is one of the many consequences of an ideologically divided society. The fact that the movies didn’t show this was a complete miss. on top of that, Harry Potter Not included is Percy’s reconciliation with Fred and George minutes before Fred’s death, which is one of the most emotional moments of the series.
7/10 Lord Voldemort is not historically present in the books
As the main antagonist of the story, Lord Voldemort is one of the most developed characters in the series. The audience gets to see him in various forms as a child, teenager and adult. Although Ralph Fiennes’ interpretation of the character is very interesting, it is not a book-accurate portrayal of Voldemort.
Although the Dark Wizard has some brutal and sinister characteristics about him, he is described as having a serious presence. The writing of the films made him dramatic with a lot of physical movement. Still, the physical portrayal of the character is on point, except for the red eyes.
6/10 Dobby was robbed of many important scenes
Dobby is one of the most important characters in the series, but besides Chamber of Secrets and Deathly Hollows: Part 1, the movies don’t really portray it. While the character design is awesome, Harry Potter Many of Dobby’s roles were given to other characters, which completely ruined his adaptation in the films.
For example, in the books, Dobby gives Harry the Gillyweed for the Triwizard Tournament, and he also tells Harry about the Room of Requirement. Without Dobby’s continued loyalty to Harry, his sacrifice in the final installment of the series falls flat for those who haven’t read the books. Dobby definitely deserved more.
5/10 Harry Potter doesn’t show Harry’s sassy side
While Harry is the hero, he’s not one of the best-suited characters. Daniel Radcliffe does an excellent job in portraying many of Harry’s key traits, such as his kindness, heroism, and especially his sense of confusion in the magical world.
However, the script does not allow Radcliffe to show other aspects of the Boy Who Lived, such as his teenage angst and his sarcastic and witty comments. hero of Harry Potter He’s a much more interesting character in the books than in the movies and, since he’s the main character, it made sense for the writers to focus more on Harry’s development.
4/10 Severus Snape is not as cruel as his book counterpart
One of the most controversial opinions about Harry Potter Severus Snape is a bad character adaptation. However, it makes sense. While Rickman was an amazing actor and many fans fell in love with his portrayal of the most controversial character. Harry PotterThe movies don’t portray how cruel Snape really is in the books.
In all the movies, the audience sees Snape as a cold and strict teacher but not too evil. However, in the books, Snape constantly humiliates and terrorizes his students, especially Neville. While Rickman’s version is more appealing, it’s definitely not an accurate portrayal of the professor.
3/10 Ron Weasley was turned into comic relief
Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley is one of the most iconic performances of the 2000s. However, many Potterheads believe that the character of Ron Weasley was poorly portrayed in the films. Although Grint manages to convey Ron’s wonderful sense of humor, the films don’t show much of Ron’s down-to-earth qualities.
Harry Potter For example, some of Ron’s sentimental and loyal moments are not included. In a scene where Snape insults Hermione for having all the answers, Ron also mocks Hermione, but he defends her in the books. Moreover, in Chamber of Secrets, Ron explains what ‘mud-blood’ means and gets angry at Draco for calling Hermione that name. These moments abound in the books, but they often don’t exist in the movies.
2/10 Ginny Weasley is completely different in the books
Portraying Ginny Weasley Harry Potter The movie has been criticized the most. Many fans agree that this character is very different from his book counterpart. In the books, Ginny is brave and sarcastic, but the movies made her timid and sweet.
While there was nothing wrong with Ginny’s personality in the films, it disappointed fans who expected the character they loved in the books. On top of that, the movies didn’t set the groundwork for Harry and Ginny’s relationship, so it felt forced.
1/10 Michael Gambon’s Albus Dumbledore is so crazy
When Richard Harris tragically passed away, Michael Gambon took on the role of Albus Dumbledore. Prisoner of Azkaban. Although there is no doubt that Gambon is a very talented actor, the drastic change between the two Dumbledores left many fans disappointed.
Viewers believe that Harris’s performance was similar to Dumbledore’s portrayal in the books. While Dumbledore certainly has a lot of energy and a strong temper similar to Gamblon’s display, he is also elegant and handsome, traits that the writers seem to forget. Prisoner of Azkaban.
Next: 10 Ways Harry Potter Doesn’t Age