Black Panther: Wakanda Forever It’s released this week, and the runtime is a whopping two hours and 41 minutes. This makes the sequel one of the longest Marvel Cinematic Universe movies to date, and while 161 minutes may require a lot of ground to cover, there’s a chance it could feel a little too long.
Many movies could do with shaving off a few minutes, especially as movies get longer. But Redditors have called out some movies that could benefit from being shortened by a full hour. A 150-minute stoner comedy, a 3.5-hour monster movie, and a three-hour western set mostly in one room, Self-Indulgence became the best of these films.
Hijak thinks blonde A full hour shorter would have been beneficial, as a Redditor commented, “In the end, I literally thought it could have been 100 minutes instead of 3 hours, and would have been just as effective.” blonde It has a runtime of two hours and 46 minutes, and an ungodly amount of it is extremely exploitative and unnecessary.
It’s almost as if the movie indulged in all the toxicity of the movie industry that Monroe struggled with throughout her life. If the movie could have been made one hour and 46 minutes long, it could have conveyed a better message. Not only that, but it certainly got a very good reception from critics and Netflix subscribers, viz blonde Currently sits at 42% on Rotten Tomatoes and 5.5 on IMDb.
Darklord_Bravo pointed to the 2021 superhero movie, suggesting, “infinite Could easily have been an hour shorter and it would have been much better.” infinite set a precedent, as it was the first Marvel Cinematic Universe movie to be rated “Rotten” on Rotten Tomatoes, but cutting an hour of runtime might not make it “fresh”.
Shortening the runtime would not have changed the way the characters were written, which was a major criticism of the film. Not only that, as the film has around 12 main characters, many would have been confused if the film was made for 100 minutes, saying that the runtime was necessary. There was no problem with the runtime of the film infinite; It was a screenplay.
Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014)
A lot of negativity has been thrown around transformer franchise, and quite understandably so, as many critics think they’re CGI fests full of crude one-liners. But Kapkomsky thinks that with a more unpredictable editor, Transformers: Age of Extinction can be great. The Redditor notes, “Honestly, it’s a pretty good and entertaining bad movie, but it was too long. An hour less landscape shots and pure car commercials would have been perfect.”
User makes an excellent point, as there is a lot of product placement transformer Cutting those shots alone would make for a significantly shorter film. Cutting an hour would make the 2014 movie an hour and 45 minutes, and that makes for a really fun popcorn flick.
This user thinks Batman, which is one of the longest superhero movies of all time, is an hour too long. The Redditor posits, “The movie felt like it ended after Falcone was killed. Then BAM, there’s a whole hour. That moment felt like the perfect climax to the movie.”
Batman At just three hours shorter, and at an hour and 55 minutes, the film could hardly have had the same impact. However, part of the film’s appeal is the dark aesthetic and the caped crusader roaming around soaking up the beauty of this new depiction of Gotham, and the film definitely needs a longer runtime to achieve that. But it ends up being a by-the-numbers superhero movie in the final act with a big action sequence, and it doesn’t quite fit in with everything that came before.
The Lone Ranger (2013)
JonnyS212 points to the 2013 Western remake, The Lone Ranger, as a film that would be greatly improved with an hour cut out. However, the movie has one major fan, as sung by Quentin Tarantino of the Lone Ranger praises on several occasions, most notably noting the final action sequence with the epic train set piece.
Unfortunately, the middle act leading up to the sequence is such a slog, and if the 2.5 movie had been a lean 90 minutes, it would have gotten a much better reception, and Tarantino would have just put it on his list of favorites of 2013. .
No Time To Die (2021)
Coolman_Rosso argues that the two-hour-and-43-minute No Time to Die should have been shortened by a full hour. The Redditor notes, “Rami Malek accomplishes his goal halfway through the movie, then decides to kill a bunch of people just because the movie isn’t over yet.”
In fairness, the movie had a lot to cover, as it was the conclusion of a five-film epic. James Bond Series led by Daniel Craig. And along with covering multiple story arcs, be it Bond’s relationship with Blofeld or his life with Madeleine, the film adds more story arcs that need to be wrapped up by the end of the movie. It’s hard to breathe there because the movie is so full. But the Redditor isn’t wrong when it comes to the villain’s unclear intentions in the second half.
Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
This user thinks Blade Runner 2049 If it was a full hour shorter it could be very lean. The Redditor explains, “I can’t be the only one dying for this ending. Not only was it long, but the molasses pacing didn’t do it any favors either.” Blade Runner 2049 Totally bombed at the box office, and this was due to several factors, such as it being a sequel to a movie that bombed 40 years earlier, it was also due to its extremely long runtime.
The sci-fi sequel clocks in at two hours and 43 minutes, and as the Redditor notes, it moves at a snail’s pace. And the original movie’s protagonist, Deckard, isn’t even introduced until about 100 minutes in. The film is excellent, while it sits at 163 minutes, random shots focusing on fire and clouds could easily be cut.
King Kong (2005)
At three hours and 21 minutes, Rook 36 considers Peter Jackson King Kong An hour is too long. The Redditor posits, “Take out a lot of the island stuff and travel to the island stuff. Take out the dude who can’t read because he disappears after the second act and doesn’t matter to the film as a whole.”
However, if all the scenes set on Skull Island were removed, it would almost be a shot-for-shot remake of the 1933 original film, and would not stand out except for the updated visual effects. The island scenes are evocative and add a compelling existential element to the story. However, the scenes depicting Carl Denham trying to make his film are unnecessary, and cutting them would trim the runtime significantly.
The Hateful Eight (2015)
If an interim is included, The Hateful Eight That’s about 190 minutes, which Beatupford thinks is completely unnecessary. A redditor complains that many of Tarantino’s recent films are too bloated, and that they make a big deal that “Reservoir dogs A masterpiece and it was less than 100 minutes. The man knows how to do it.”
However The Hateful Eight An hour was short, it would still be over two hours, and many scenes would not be missed if they were cut. There are several scenes in the middle act that lengthen the film unnecessarily, such as Daisy singing a song and Tarantino’s voiceover summarizing everything that has already happened in the sequence.
Inherent Vice (2014)
For much of his career, famed writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson seemed to have no idea how to make a film that wasn’t too long. Boogie Nights 155 minutes, Magnolia 188 minutes, There will be blood 158 minutes, and Master 150 minutes. But Dudetheman444 thinks that all visionary filmmakers’ movies, Underlying Sub Hours should be reduced.
In 148 minutes, Underlying Sub It’s on the weak side when it comes to Anderson’s filmography, but that much time is still spent admiring 70s set designs and costume designs rather than advancing the story. are being influenced by movies like The Big LebowskiThe 2014 release is a hilarious stoner detective comedy, but it can be told in a tight 100 minutes.
Next: 10 Best Movies Where Nothing Actually Happens, According to Reddit